AS9102C - Form 1

Form 1

3. (CR) Serial Number: Each serial number from the first production run used to complete the FAIR should be recorded.

4. (R) FAIR Identifier: Each First Article Inspection Report should have a unique identification. It should not be the part number only, but it can include the part number. The intent is to maintain traceability to full and partial FAI.

5. (CR) Part Revision Level: When the configuration is controlled by drawing revision level and a part revision level does not exist, this
field may be left blank. When a part revision level is defined within the engineering definition, it will be recorded in this field.

14. (R) Full FAI / Partial FAI: It is the best practice to add as much detail as needed. For process changes, additional information can provide valuable information; examples include fixture IDs, the program number/revision change, specifics on location change, specific part of the changed process, material type change.

15. (CR) Part Number: The parts listed in field 15 are the components of the assembly for which the FAIR is being completed. When a drawing has multiple levels of BOMs associated with a single drawing then include the uppermost assembly/part number included in this product only when the lower level items are accounted for on Sub assembly FAIRs. The intent is to maintain FAIR traceability to all components without creating duplication.

18. (CR) FAIR Identifier: This field contains the FAIR numbers or organization identifier for any component with a FAIR. Per 1.3 application, COTS do not require a FAIR, field 18 may be left blank in this case. It has been noted this field is sometimes being used for CoC, although this field is not intended for CofC usage.

• For Customer furnished detail/parts, are accounted for this on Form 1 fields 15 through 18. In field 18, note this was a Customer furnished detail/part. It is not necessary to obtain a FAIR document from the customer.

19. (R) Does FAIR Contain a Documented Nonconformance(s)? This was changed from complete/not complete due to confusion. This is marked “Yes” when there is a nonconformance requiring a partial FAI to account for the failed design characteristic(s). An Assembly FAI can be completed and marked as “No”’ on form one, field 19, as long as all characteristics at the assembly level are found to be conforming during the Assembly FAI. If a characteristic of a component (with its own FAI) within the assembly has a nonconformance, but does not affect the assembly Characteristic, then the Assembly FAI can be completed and have fields 19 through 22 completed.

20. (R) FAIR Verified By: This is the person who brings all the information together for the FAIR and verifies the FAIR is ready for review/approval. The accuracy of the information should be embedded in the processes used to input the information. This person accounts for the completion of the activities in section 4.4, not the accuracy of the information others have entered.

21. (R) Date: Best practice is to spell out the month due to different day and month formatting.

22. (R) FAIR Reviewed/Approved By: The person verifying all the requirements of 9102 have been accounted for and accomplished. Although a second person (different than person identified in field 20) is not required, best practice is to have a second person reviewing the information to double check all requirements have been accounted for and accomplished. Provision for the same person was created to accommodate small organizations who do not have a second FAI competent employee available to perform the review/approval.

26. (O) Comments: Best practice for parts, Standard Catalogue Item or COTS alternatives and substitutions is to show the linkage from the drawing to the allowable alternative.